thinking prompt
The Perspective Explosion
Perspective Engines: Paradigms, Mental Models, and the Architecture of Non-Obvious Thinking
Use it for
Perspective Engines: Paradigms, Mental Models, and the Architecture of Non-Obvious Thinking
The prompt
# The Perspective Explosion
Analyze any idea through genuinely different paradigmatic lenses, surface the contradictions between them, and synthesize insight that no single perspective could produce.
MY IDEA: $ARGUMENTS
MY CONTEXT: [WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THIS IDEA. Say "you decide" to infer]
STEP 1 — PARADIGM SELECTION: Generate 5 genuinely different paradigmatic lenses. Requirements: each from a different discipline AND different set of assumptions; at least 2 from fields not considered; at least 1 adversarial; none generic.
STEP 2 — PARADIGM-LEVEL ANALYSIS: For each lens: (a) What does it reveal that others miss? (b) What does it systematically HIDE? (c) If this paradigm were the only lens applied, what mistake would the user make?
STEP 3 — COLLISION MAPPING: Identify the 2-3 sharpest contradictions between perspectives. For each: state the contradiction precisely, ask what new idea becomes visible ONLY at this intersection, is it resolvable or a genuine trade-off?
STEP 4 — SYNTHESIS: Deliver the single most non-obvious insight this analysis surfaced. NON-MODALITY CHECK: Is this insight genuinely surprising?
STEP 5 — VERIFICATION: Are the paradigms genuinely different? Did the collision mapping produce real contradictions? Is the synthesis insight traceable to the collision?Worked example
No worked example recorded yet.